Member Area
News
Chamber News
A LEVY TOO FAR? | A LEVY TOO FAR? |
|
|
| Monday, 18 February 2008 | |
|
Alastair Reid is partner at Halliwells and Chairman of Sheffield Chamber of Commerce’s Sheffield Property and Regeneration Committee (SPARC).
The hard pressed development industry may soon be hit by further costs following Housing Minister Yvette Cooper’s announcement of how the new Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is to work. The CIL is the replacement for the previously proposed Planning Gain Supplement. It is intended that the CIL will be used to fund infrastructure projects but Section 106 agreements (legal agreements between local authorities and developers) will still be used to fund site specific requirements and included in the Planning Bill which has just begun its committee stage in Parliament. The purpose of the CIL is to ensure that costs incurred in providing infrastructure to support the development of an area can be funded wholly or partly by owners of land when land increases because for development has been granted. The CIL will give councils the power to set charges to pay for infrastructure when a new development takes place and is hoped to unlock hundreds of millions of pounds more for local infrastructure and services at a cost to be met by developers. Under the current system, only 14 per cent of all residential planning permissions make any contribution to the cost of supporting infrastructure, and these generally cover the largest schemes. CIL will apply across the board and affect even minor developments.
The new powers will allow councils to set a CIL for their area following an assessment of local infrastructure needs and consultation with their local community. Different types and sizes of development would pay different amounts depending on local needs to help ensure the new infrastructure needed to maintain sustainable growth is provided. In introducing both these changes at the same time in the current economic climate, there is real concern that their dual impact will make developers look at the spiralling costs of developments and consider whether their future projects are in fact now viable if the new rules apply. The effect of this could be to put a brake on the Government’s plans for housing growth. SPARC, a group acting on behalf of Chamber members, is being consulted on the policies and will be lobbying for an urgent rethink. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|


